Analysts Believe the 2020 Election is NOT Adding Up

By Dr. Steve Turley

"Aren't you just being a sore loser?" taunted the left-wing activist disguised as journalist Jim Acosta of CNN at a White House press briefing. Acosta's, well, accosting is indicative of a dismissive mainstream media that found supposedly insurmountable evidence for a Russian collusion hoax but can't seem to recognize a single instance of fraud in the 2020 election. But this dismissiveness is itself unjustified. That's not merely my opinion; it's the assessment of a number of highly reputable poll analysts who regard the radical anomalies in this election as highly suspicious. For example, analyst Patrick Basham of the Democracy Institute has recently written a very helpful piece entitled 'Reasons why the 2020 election is deeply puzzling' that lays out precisely what analysts find so perplexing.

First and foremost, consider how well President Trump actually did on November 3rd. Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking reelection ever. That in and of itself shatters the mainstream media-driven narrative that voters despised and rejected President Trump, or even Ann Coulter's notion that voters wanted Trumpism without Trump. If that's true, then why did he receive more votes than any previous incumbent president seeking reelection, including Presidents that voters loved, like Ronald Reagan? How do you explain the fact that Trump got 11 million more votes in 2020 than in 2016, which represents the third largest rise in support ever for an incumbent? [more...]