1. Michael
Stumo: WTO Ruling Against Country of Origin Labeling
Causes Spike in Beef Imports
2. Michelle
Seiler-Tucker: Taking on Hillary and the GOP, Trump Aims for
the Oval Office
3. James
Hirsen: The Democrat Wall of Hypocrisy
4. Joe
Messina: Political Correctness Kills 49 More
5. Wayne Root:
Another Obama
Embarrassment
6. Lowell
Ponte: Was Hamilton America’s First Donald Trump?
7. Dr. Gerard
Lameiro: What is the Impact of the Orlando Massacre on
the Presidential Election?
WTO Ruling Against Country of Origin Labeling
Causes Spike in Beef Imports
By Michael Stumo, CEO of
Coalition for a Prosperous America
A spike in beef imports has occurred, but
consumers are unaware because a global tribunal said last December that we
can't be told where our food comes from. You may be surprised to hear that U.S.
farmers and ranchers are harmed by trade agreements. I can understand if you
believe the opposite. The media, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and large
agriculture associations (funded by the transnational food import lobby) say
that farmers and ranchers want trade deals to export to the 95% of consumers
that live outside the U.S. Those soothing words are said to lure you into
believing falsehoods. [more...]
Taking on Hillary and the GOP, Trump Aims for
the Oval Office
Many established Republicans still fail to
realize they need to get on board the “Trump train” if they want a Republican in
office. Right now, an extremely weak “Stop Trump” campaign is trying rather
vaguely, to bring around an alternative. However, the American people have
spoken and selected Trump as the candidate they wish to put in the Oval Office.
After all, America is a democracy, so the fact that a few disgruntled career
politicians want to change the rules seams un-American. For about a year now, a
vocal minority have cried, “not Trump,” yet in response, a silent majority
responded with votes. Currently, the polls are neck and neck. Hillary is just a
few points above Trump, but continued investigation into Hillary will likely
tarnish her campaign. Slowly, I believe the GOP will see the light and endorse
Trump to the fullest extent. [more...]
The Democrat Wall of Hypocrisy
By James Hirsen
At a commencement address in May, in a
scarcely concealed swipe at Trump, Obama urged Rutgers University graduates to
reject anyone who wants to build walls on the U.S. border. Evoking Trump’s
border wall, Obama said, “The point is, to help ourselves, we’ve got to help
others - not pull up the drawbridge and try to keep the world out.” At a
separate commencement address in June, First Lady Michelle Obama took aim at
Trump’s proposal as well. Bill and Hillary Clinton have been out repeating a
mantra of sorts that the U.S. should not be building walls, but bridges. However,
those of the liberal persuasion who have for a long time been demonstrating an
absurd ease with various positions that are steeped in hypocrisy now appear to
be taking things even further. The Democratic National Convention is set to
take place in Philadelphia on July 25, 2016, and plans are in the making to
secure the gathering with, of all things, a wall. [more...]
Political Correctness Kills 49 More
By Joe Messina
The Orlando killer, had been investigated or
interviewed 3 times by the FBI. After many of his coworkers “saw something and
said something,” they interviewed him and let him go because there wasn’t
enough to hold him. Then his wife divorced him because he started to show
“extreme Islamic tendencies” and even started getting violent with her. She
said, “he was not a stable person... he beat me.” She reported him. He was
again interviewed by the FBI. Then again in 2014. The agent in charge said all
interviews were “non-conclusive.” I wonder what that means? Given the
reluctance of the current administration to call these things what they are or
single out any Middle Easterner or Muslim as a possible terrorist, I wonder if
things were overlooked, on purpose? [more...]
Another Obama
Embarrassment
I hope Americans are
waking up after the pathetic Presidential address to the nation about the
Orlando Islamic terror attack. Only minutes after Obama was done with his
pathetic address to the nation, it was reported that ISIS actually took credit
for the attack. That was also undoubtedly known to him when he walked to that
podium. Yet with all of those facts at hand... Obama still did not
mention the words “Muslim” or “Radical Islam” in the entire address to the
nation. No mention was ever made of the religion or background of the worst
mass shooting in U.S. history. He knew exactly at that moment in time what this
attack was. This was 100% ISIS verified before Obama walked to that podium. So
he had to admit it was a “terror attack.” Even Obama knew he couldn’t avoid
that. [more...]
Was Hamilton America’s First Donald Trump?
By Lowell Ponte
On Sunday, the Broadway
stage play “Hamilton” won 11 Tony Awards. How odd that liberals who despise
Donald Trump’s alleged authoritarianism are paying $1,000 per seat to see a hip
hop and rap glorification of this least-liberal, and in some ways most
Trump-like, of America’s founding fathers. Perhaps liberals love the musical
“Hamilton” because it depicts this founding father opposed to slave owners such
as Jefferson. Truth be told, however, Hamilton did little to end slavery – and
may have helped his relatives buy and sell a few slaves. More likely, liberals
applaud Hamilton as an advocate of a powerful central government who worked to
become part of the ruling elite. They do not even know that Hamilton was eager
to restrict immigration and impose trade restrictions. Exactly the same could
be said of Donald Trump, who at some not-too-distant future time will doubtless
be the central figure of a successful Broadway musical like “Hamilton.” [more...]
What is the Impact of the Orlando Massacre on
the Presidential Election?
With the Orlando massacre, the presidential
election has just hit an electoral pivot point, if not a tipping point, that
might ultimately determine the election outcome. Voters have been impacted
dramatically. Voter intensity and voter momentum will likely change effective
immediately. With the highly charged Orlando news, terrorism and illegal
immigration have moved front and center to the hearts and minds of most voters.
This is an issue that plays to Trump’s strengths. Even among the LGBT
community (normally considered to be more favorable to Democratic candidates),
Trump might jump ahead of Clinton. In his Monday speech, Trump clearly signaled
the LGBT community that he intends to protect all Americans and they should favor his tough position on
protecting them. Clinton’s anti-gun rhetoric loses when Americans are worried
about their safety and when terrorism is their dominant issue of the
presidential campaign. [Go here for a complete analysis...]
No comments:
Post a Comment