Michael Reagan: Trump
Right to Worry About AT&T, Time Warner Merger
Today,
the Senate Judiciary committee will hold a significant hearing on the proposed
$84 billion merger between AT&T and Time Warner, which owns CNN.
AT&T's
CEO Randall Stephenson will be testifying, as well as others, who support or
oppose this merger. The senators should be prepared to ask Stephenson some
tough questions – because allowing this merger will have important implications
for a free press and American democracy for many years to come. During the
recent election candidate Trump said, "AT&T is buying Time Warner, and
thus CNN, a deal we will not approve in my administration because it's too much
concentration of power in the hands of too few."
Since
then, a number of press reports – no doubt pushed by AT&T – are suggesting
President Trump will have a laissez-faire approach and the deal will go
through. Knowing of the grassroots concerns that many conservative leaders
share, I doubt President Trump or Congress will rubber stamp this deal.
Trump
was right when he warned of the massive concentration of media power in a few
hands. Consider that today 90 percent of cable television networks are owned by
just six companies: Time Warner (CNN), Viacom, CBS, ABC, Comcast (NBC) and 21st
Century Fox. Of these major conglomerates, only Fox gives conservatives a fair
shake. New, independent networks like NewsmaxTV
are on the rise, but the big media still controls, dangerously, the flow of
information to the public. Trump was their most recent victim.
A
combination of AT&T and Time Warner will be toxic, further constricting
competition and press diversity. AT&T is a giant media company which also
owns DirecTV. They also were a major corporate backer of Hillary Clinton's
presidential campaign. They strongly opposed Donald Trump's election.
Time
Warner's CNN was nothing short of the "Clinton News Network" – a
24-hour propaganda machine spewing out anti-Trump and anti-Republican venom.
Right
now AT&T has 26.3 million pay TV subscribers through DirecTV and ATT
U-verse service – controlling about 25 percent of the U.S. cable market. They
are the largest cable/satellite operator in the U.S. bar none. By owning the
largest chunk of cable home distribution, AT&T will obviously be in a
position to favor their own channels like CNN, over other channels like Fox
News, Newsmax and many others. The ability for AT&T to discriminate against
other cable networks that could compete against CNN or their other networks
would be endless.
AT&T,
which controls a huge percent of the mobile telephone market, could exempt its
mobile customers from data usage charges if they stream CNN content, but
streaming independent news networks like Newsmax might continue to count
against high speed data caps.
Frankly,
I am usually in favor of government keeping its hands-off business activities. But
there are exceptions. When certain businesses act like monopolies or near
monopolies, have unusual access to publicly-owned or controlled distribution
systems, and get preferential access to broadcast/satellite airwaves, then
government has a compelling need to insure that such media companies act in a
fair way to insure competition and the diversity of public opinion.
We
already know that vertical integration of cable operators undermines
competition. For example, when Comcast completed its merger of NBC back in
2011, it promised that it would not favor its own channels over other channels. It agreed to a condition that would have put
the Bloomberg financial news channel on equal footing with CNBC across its
distribution platform. It is well known that Comcast never honored the condition.
For this and other reasons, Comcast's recent effort to merge with Time Warner
was rejected.
AT&T
has not demonstrated, in my opinion, a real desire to support the public's
interest in the areas of competition, diversity and fairness. Recently the Department
of Justice sued AT&T and its subsidiary DirecTV for price fixing and
illegally colluding to harm consumers.
There
are many reasons why the FCC and Congress needs to handle this merger with
intense scrutiny and remember this is not a business decision, but a matter
that affects our democratic institutions. President-elect Trump knows this
firsthand. [more...]
Michael
Reagan is the son of President Reagan and chairman of the Reagan Legacy
Foundation. A New York Times best-selling author, he is a commentator for
Newsmax.
No comments:
Post a Comment