By Eric Blehm
For the past week,
since the announcement about President-elect Trump's pick for Defense
Secretary, I have been barraged by requests from the media to talk about what I
know based on what I'd written about General Mattis in my book, The Only Thing Worth Dying For in
2010. I've received quite a bit of hate mail for what some believe
is my intention to bring down and smear retired Marine General James 'Mad Dog'
Mattis, simply because I accurately reported an event
that happened years ago. I have dedicated my life and career to telling the
stories of heroes, yet now I'm being mistakenly characterized as someone trying
to bring down a beloved General.
In my 2010 New York
Times bestselling book, The Only Thing Worth Dying For: How
Eleven Green Berets Fought for a New Afghanistan, I write about how General Mattis
refused to send his men and helicopters to MEDEVAC the wounded from a mass
casualty situation. An A Team of Green Berets who were assigned to Hamid
Karzai had been hit by friendly fire on December 5, 2001- an errant 2,000-pound
Jdam bomb called in erroneously on their position. Although the bulk of the
book recounts the team's mission with Karzai, after the bomb hit, its focus
shifted to their survival. The Green Berets requested immediate assistance from
Mattis, the leader of the closest unit with the ability to respond, but he was
stubbornly unwilling to help as was reported to me by eyewitnesses.
General Mattis's
actions, which were not formally investigated at the time, are now likely to
get more scrutiny during the retired general's Senate confirmation process.
I've been told I might be called to testify since my book is the only published
account of that mission - and that terrible day when all but one member of
then-Captain Jason Amerine's eleven-man team was either seriously wounded or
killed.
Last week, a few days
shy of the fifteen-year anniversary of December 5, Amerine, now a retired Lieutenant
Colonel, wrote a post on his Facebook page saying in part that Mattis "was
indecisive and betrayed his duty to us, leaving my men to die during the golden
hour when he could have reached us... The delay of Mattis in launching MEDEVAC
that day was never in question, not even by him. The only debate was whether it
was justified and how many died, as a result."
What are the
brutal facts behind one of the most heated debates in politics this week? Did
General Mattis betray his duty and leave men to die? Or was he acting
responsibly based on the facts he had at hand? Or is it a matter of different
policies within the Conventional and Special Operations communities? How many
died? Who could have been saved? Did he make a mistake that he learned from? And
is he fit to serve as the Secretary of Defense? Was Mattis interviewed to hear
his side of the story?
Both Amerine and
Mattis are beloved leaders in their respective communities, and the quote by
Amerine started up a viral storm of polarized opinions on social media and in
the news that is still playing out. For my part, I have given numerous
interviews about The Only
Thing Worth Dying For in recent days, (and posted one of the
articles on my Facebook page) that have elicited a huge range of heated responses.
The comments on that page run from "hate mail" that accuses me of
being a liberal on a smear campaign who writes fiction, to those angry with
mainstream media for trying to take down an American hero... to those with
reasonable questions about why Mattis did what he did... to those who were on
the ground on December 5, 2001, who staunchly stand behind what I reported in
my book. [more...]
No comments:
Post a Comment