By
Lowell Ponte
Not many decades ago, a judge would weigh such remarks
against how a woman dressed and acted. To wear short skirts or low cleavage was
sometimes used to justify sexist harassment, or even to defend a rapist’s
outrageous claim that the woman was “asking for it.” The good news is that we
now are much more enlightened about women’s rights, and that such claims will
never again be used to vindicate a sexual attacker.
The bad news is that this same rationale of past rapists
is now used by political radicals. Ann Coulter has dressed herself in
provocatively stimulating (and therefore dangerous) ideas, the radicals have
said. And because this has aroused them emotionally, they are entitled to take
her down by force.
The University of California Berkeley refused to
guarantee Coulter’s safety. Emerging evidence of the Berkeley mayor’s links to
radical activists suggested that, as in the past, city police have been ordered
to stand down and let activists engage in violent, destructive behavior. Yet
another attempt by Leftist partisans to impose a “heckler’s veto” on
non-Leftist speakers seemed likely. [more...]
No comments:
Post a Comment