2. James Hirsen: Smollett Gets Hit with a Lawsuit as Chicago Seeks Justice
3. Lowell Ponte: Overcoming the Democrat Matrix
4. Karen Kataline: Democrats Will Keep Changing the Rules Until They Can Never Lose
5. Jerome Corsi: From the Inside of the Mueller Probe
Four
Important Reasons Stocks Fall
By Crista Huff
We all know that stock prices can fall, but if we can determine
why they’re falling, then we can better understand whether to buy, sell or
hold. Here are some common scenarios. A stock falls immediately upon delivering an earnings report; when the
company announces good news; when the company announces temporary bad
news; and a company announces significant bad news. Stock
investing is a learned skill. It can be complicated and frustrating. It can
also be lucrative, exciting, interesting and fun. Anybody can watch a stock go
up 50% and pat themselves on the back; but the amount of wisdom you exhibit on
the darker days will determine your long-term success. And knowing the reasons
stocks fall is a big part of that. [more...]
Smollett
Gets Hit with a Lawsuit as Chicago Seeks Justice
By James Hirsen
Jussie Smollett may regret his failure to pay a bill sent to him
courtesy of the City of Chicago. After an extensive investigative process, a
demand for payment was sent to the alleged hate crime hoaxer in an effort by
the city to obtain reimbursement for costs incurred due to Smollett’s claims. The
letter gave the “Empire” actor seven days in which to pay an amount of
approximately $130,000. Smollett is refusing to pay the city anything - not a
single solitary penny. He continues to publicly claim that he has been
“truthful and consistent on every single level since day one,” despite the fact
that one of his lawyers has already fundamentally altered the facts of his
claims. Smollett may be about to reap the whirlwind because of a civil lawsuit
that the city of Chicago plans to file against him. [more...]
Overcoming
the Democrat Matrix
By Lowell Ponte
Today’s young leftist utopians are hot-headed but cold-hearted,
utterly bereft of human compassion, tolerance, fairness, feeling or the ability
to laugh at one’s self. They seem either to be zombies or machines, ready only
to hate, control, silence or kill anyone who disagrees with them. Many seem
inhuman and insane. Nowhere is this more evident than in left-leaning social
media such as Google, which just eliminated its A.I. ethics board after only
one week. Like Facebook, Google wants to become The Matrix, controlling an
artificial reality where leftist views are amplified while conservative voices
are silenced. These Silicon Valley tyrants pretend that objective algorithms
impose political correctness fairly – but biased humans write the algorithms,
which Google and Facebook refuse to let outsiders analyze. Facebook was
originally designed to act like an addictive drug on young minds. The leftists’
desire to be society’s “Dominatrix” is the essence of the Democrat Matrix, the
dictatorship that red-pill-choosing humankind must overcome. [more...]
Democrats
Will Keep Changing the Rules Until They Can Never Lose
By Karen Kataline
Democrats refuse to stop messing with our voter laws. Bernie
Sanders just proposed that felons be allowed to vote even while they are still
in prison. Democrats constantly push for these changes with a straight face,
claiming that their newest-fangled scheme would make elections more
“fair.” Sadly, some states have adopted a few of these voter schemes with
Republican support. If Democrats were so confident that they could win or that
the only reason they lose is because the election was stolen from them by
Russian oligarchs or guys named “Chad,” why do they keep trying to change the
rules of the game? The answer to this rhetorical question is that they are not
confident. They know that underneath their divisive, identity politics,
they have no ideas except socialism. Yet, some Republicans still behave like it
is up to them to “reach across the aisle because their opponents have such good
intentions. [more...]
By Jerome Corsi
Robert Mueller’s probe crashed and burned in large part because
the FBI and the prosecutors were convinced erroneously that I had personal
contact with Julian Assange that permitted me to introduce Roger Stone to WikiLeaks.
If I had introduced Mr. Stone to Julian Assange, the prosecutors believed, this
introduction would have permitted Mr. Stone, who was in touch by telephone with
then-candidate Donald Trump, “to collude” with WikiLeaks to time the release of
Podesta e-mails in October 2016 so as to cause maximum damage to Hillary
Clinton’s presidential campaign. In my 40-hour ordeal, the prosecutors from the
Office of the Special Counsel also made clear they believed the Trump campaign
had convinced Russia to steal John Podesta’s e-mails and give them to WikiLeaks
for publication. So, the hypothesis Mr. Mueller was trying to prove was that
the “Russia collusion” link was Assange-Corsi-Stone-Trump - a linkage that I
never caused to happen. [more...]
No comments:
Post a Comment